Alanf’s blog…
Scattered thoughts

Tuesday, December 14, 2004

Underdogs…

Author: site admin
Category: MotoGP

A lot has been written in the magazines lately about the new Motoczysz bike (both Cycle World and Roadracing World have done recent articles) and the bike is also generating a lot of buzz on the blogs and motorcycle news web sites. Add in the recent magazine articles and books about John Britten’s bikes in the early ’90s and the buzz Kenny Roberts is generating with his KTM engined Proton MotoGP bike and you have full blown resurgence in underdog appreciation.

Motoczysz bike

First, let me say that the MotoCzysz project is very cool. Any time someone goes into their garage and comes out with something that is new, interesting and more importantly that actually works, it is worth celebrating. That this team have put together something on their own is fantastic and I wish them all the best.

However, with that said, I think much of the buzz is more wishful thinking than honest appraisal. Everyone wants to see the underdog succeed. Lots of folks want to see someone stick it to the man. We grew up with fairy tales about the little people accomplishing the impossible. How can you not want to see Motoczysz come up with a viable MotoGP bike? Not to throw a wet blanket on the excitement but lets look at the three most recent examples with a critical eye…

First, I’ll commit the heresy of actually criticizing the Britten. The bike was many thing…innovative, beautiful, soulful sounding, creative and powerful. But as a race bike, it still needed a lot of refinement. I saw the thing race two different times: First in ‘92 at Daytona with Andrew Stroud and then again a year later at Road Atlanta with Nick Ienatsch. Both times the bike was stunningly fast but its handling characteristics were scary to watch. At Daytona, the bike had a high speed weave so pronounced it was visible from the pit area. Likewise, at Road Atlanta I talked with Nick in the pits and he mentioned the Britten he was riding had a head shake on the back straight which was causing him to roll off the throttle before the old “Gravity cavity”. To paraphrase Rob Muzzy “underpowered bikes always handle well”. Its getting them to handle well with power that is the trick. Additionally, the Britten suffered from reliability issues. The 1992 Dayonta Twins race came to an end with a failed electrical connector. Ienatsch’s Road Atlanta race ended even worse when one of the cam belts broke and wrecked the motor. The extreme of this is the 1994 Isle of Man disaster where a carbon fiber wheel came apart resulting in the death of rider Mark Farmer. The Britten was revolutionary but even after years of development was far from a finished product.

Second, the TeamKR Proton which hopes to start its ninth year of GP competition next season and has long been touted as the ultimate “David versus Goliath” story with Mr. Roberts and his gang taking on the might of Japan. While the image has a grand romantic story book quality too it, the analogy isn’t very accurate unless David’s main job was harassing Goliath with spit balls. The V3 version of the Proton had great promise but other than a few odd rain races or heroic qualifying sessions, the bike failed to live up to its lofty goals. The V5 four-stroke had an even more abysmal record despite having even more hype surrounding it. Initial reports of the new KTM motored version indicate their back sliding may have stopped but it has a long way to go in both reliability, power and rider results before the project can truly be considered an effective alternative to the power of Japan, Inc.

Finally, no Grand Prix underdog article can really be written without at least mentioning the WCM Grand Prix machine. So there, I’ve mentioned it. Nothing more really needs to be said…

I’m excited to see another person enter the fray that is roadracing competition with their own bike and I think the project may generate more interest in the Laguna Seca round of the 2005 MotoGP season since it is certain to continue to get more press. That is also a good thing. But I’m very skeptical that they’ll make the race or, if they do, that they’ll qualify. Its a long way from a garage in Portland to a garage in the big leagues of MotoGP. Still, skepticism be damned, I’ll keep my fingers crossed for them since I like to cheer for the underdog too…

[image from USA Superbike web page]

3 Comments so far

1.

steve brunton
December 15th, 2004 at 2:04 pm

I actually got the see the MotoCzysz bike up close and heard it run with both Mike and this Spencer dude on board. It sounds pretty nice. The front end design that he came up with is pretty slick and he also had it on an R1 that he was playing with around the track at LVX.

2.

Dean W
December 17th, 2004 at 10:58 am

What’s it take to put a bike on the grid in a GP race, and still be running (never mind competitive) at the end of the race?

Development, development, development. Development, development, development.
(Picture Steve Ballmer saying it, and you get how important it is.

Until and unless Czysz has the budget and will to blow up a couple dozen motors and let a serious development rider throw a few copies of his prototype down the track, it’s a fun exercise but ultimately doomed.

Don’t get me wrong- I’m all for his concept and if my lunch money would make a dent in the millions he needs to spend to get where he wants to go, he’s welcome to it. America needs a modern bike, the industry as a whole could use a few innovations, and I don’t see them coming from anyone else. But the gentlemen of the GP grid are going to eat him alive if he shows up at Laguna Seca without first having spent the GNP of a medium-small country and with a trailer full of spare motors, parts, and a couple complete bikes.

3.

Alanf
December 17th, 2004 at 5:16 pm

Hey Steve -

Wow, that’s awesome that you got to see the bike on-track. I think they have the right idea in that they have to innovate because the current factories (with their armies of engineers) can evolve designs faster than MotoCzysz can possibly hope to accomplish. Like James Parker’s RADD, it is possible for the individual to beat the factories at the creativity game.

I definitely agree with Dean about the MotoCzysz project being held back by lack of development. That has consistently been Kenny Roberts complaint about this Proton team. I’ll be surprised if the C2 shows up at Laguna, much less whether it can turn lap times that allow it to qualify.

Still, I wish ‘em the best…

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

-->